About your nation
We are here to help the elderly and disabled get our legislators to stop a healthcare bill that will impact their lives and not for the better. By telling them they have a choice of healthcare at a rate of 2 to 5 times what a younger, healthier person would pay. Leaving them to choose either a roof over their head and food to eat or this deceiving bogus healthcare they are pushing.
We know that the goal of the Government is now to basically get the money back that over the decades they have stolen from Social Security and Medicare to fund their many projects.
What better way for them to do this than implementing a eugenics program and disguising it as healthcare? What they fail to realize is that this affects every one of us, every race, both old and young because this will affect the young who love their parents and grandparents.
For those of you who have compared Trump to Hitler you need to realize that this is the best comparison Hitler was big on eugenics and a master race. Remember it is not just Trump it is most of his party. I am ashamed I have always been a Democrat and I was fooled and voted for Trump, so I cannot blame anyone else who also voted for Trump and now realizes what a catastrophic mistake they made.
Here is a link to something worth reading. http://www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/euthanasiakeyissues/population-control/
The following is a little taste:
Eugenics in action
In 1922, two men a lawyer and a psychiatrist, Karl Binding, J.D., and Alfred Hoche, M.D. together wrote a short book entitled Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens (Permission to Destroy Life Devoid of Value). This book was cited at the Nuremberg War Trials as the key factor behind the Nazi T4 euthanasia programme which led to the Death Camps.
Hitler's determination to establish his "master race" was at first approved by eugenicists in other countries, and in America, Margaret Sanger's Birth Control Review praised the effectiveness of the Germans, and published articles by RÃ¼din and others. 3 German doctors who were involved with the T4 programme initially began the practice of killing the intellectually and physically disabled for reasons of compassion.
The testimony at Nuremberg of Karl Brandt, the medic responsible for co-ordinating the German euthanasia programme, show us how easy it is for well-meaning people to become desensitised by their actions:
Driven underground following the Second World War, and reports of Nazi atrocities, the Eugenics movement is once more florishing in many countries, funded and supported by extremely wealthy organisations, foundations and people.
Dr. Carlos Paton Blacker, of the Eugenics Society in England, called for a new policy which he called "crypto-eugenics." The principal tool of crypto-eugenics was to be Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood began in the offices of the Eugenics Society, and stayed there for many years. The work of the organization was to provide birth control for the dysgenic. 5
The field of bioethics is a response to issues raised by eugenics. Bioethics is based on situation ethics, which was developed largely by Joseph Fletcher, a member of the American Eugenics Society.
The word 'bioethics' was first used to refer to questions about population and environment, in the late 1960's. In the 1970's, it came to refer to questions including abortion, contraception, euthanasia and artificial insemination.
A new focus
In 1952, Planned Parenthood and the Population Council were funded, founded and staffed by eugenicists. The eugenics movement was alive and thriving, still working to get rid of unwanted populations.
Some of the well-known arms of the Eugenics movement are: The Marie Stopes Memorial Foundation, a subsidiary subsidised by the Eugenics Society; the Family Planning Association and the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, which are heavily financed by the Eugenics Society; the Voluntary Sterilisation Association was directed from the same address as the Eugenics Society; the Galton Foundation, run by the Eugenics Society; and others.
When it comes to population control, the same people seem interchangeable in the administration hierarchies. The same eugenicists who promoted abortion are now pushing for euthanasia to kill the old who, they say, have become non-productive and a burden to society.The same argument being used for both abortion and euthanasia is that of 'personhood'.
Disabled rights activist groups are becoming more prominent in the fight against the legalisation of EAS. Groups such as Not Dead Yet and Do No Harm are constantly in the public eye whenever there are court cases involving those seeking a right-to-die, or those accused of a 'mercy killing.'
In America in the mid-1980's, Richard Scott, a Hemlock co-founder, and psychologist Faye Girsh, the Executive Director of the Hemlock Society, brought and pursued a "right to die" court case on behalf of a 26-year-old woman with cerebral palsy in California, Elizabeth Bouvia, who asked for help to starve to death after a miscarriage and marriage break-up.
Medical killing is the most cost-effective way to "treat" expensive health conditions, and many Health Providers facing budget deficits are practicing healthcare rationing.
Almost every country in the developed world, where birth control and abortion are practised, is facing a population implosion due to fertility rates dropping below replacement level.
In many countries, more people are dying each year than are being born. European populations are beginning to die off and their governments are suddenly encountering a host of new social problems, such as increasing numbers of the elderly, relative to other population sectors and labour shortages.
Some countries are offering women incentives to have more children but even if this does work, it will not happen quickly enough to remedy the fact that there will soon be more people of retirement age than taxpayers can support.
Opponents to EAS claim that, when this happens, it will become a citizen's duty-to-die.